
to the Symbol's Method - 7
|
THE SYMBOL'S METHOD - 8
|
3.- THE FIELD OF ANGULAR FACTORS AND
HAMILTONS PRINCIPLE.
3.1.- INTRODUCTION
Generally speaking, a field can
be defined as a bounded area. Daily life offers simple examples of it: a wheat field, a
soccer field, and more abstract such as the acting field , working field, field of study,
etc.
Physics goes deeper and
sophisticates the field concept. The effort of eminent physicists at the end of XIX and
beginnings of XX centuries created the so called Field Theory.
Among those scientists Faraday and Einstein conceived the possibility of expressing the
whole underlying reality of the Universe by means of a field. But while Faraday saw the
world as a field of forces, Einstein saw it as a field of "curved" spaces.
According to Einstein forces were a tangible but illusory by-product, of an ultimate
reality which was, for him, the space curvature.
William Berkson, in his famous book "The theories of the field
forces" wonders: whether a field of forces permits a behaviour of a field which it
can not be formulated in the curved space language and goes on by saying I
do not know the answer but it must be an interesting subject and concludes by
saying: it may be that, lastly, the conclusion is that field laws could be written
indistinctly in terms of a field of forces or in terms of a curved space theory.
Naturally Berkson did not know that when he
wrote it and he did not know, either, in later Spanish editions, the field of associated
angular factors, as these were established in practice at the beginning of the 90s,
as an attempt to make concrete the philosophy of Chaos Theory applied to Financial
Markets.
Before, attempts had been made to create the field of associated
angular factors applied fundamentally on the space of related connections (Weyl 1917),
other attempts were applied on a variety of those space of related connections in which
angles but not distances were kept constant (London 1967) and there were also more modern
and of great theoretically brilliant attempts by Wheeler, but without practical results.
In the "fields of associated angular factors", we are now
introducing, the practical applications are immediate and, moreover, the two conceptions
coexist. On one side Faraday, force fields, in a sense that each position of the field is
identified with forces. On the other side the vision of Einstein in the sense that each
position of the bounded space or field, is identified with contractions. Notwithstanding,
neither forces are properly so in Faradays sense, nor contractions in
Einsteins sense.
Hamiltons principle, also
called the principle of minimal action, it is the most general formulation of the general
law of movement which postulates that a whole system which occupies determined positions
in a certain moment, moves within these positions in a way that the resulting integral of
this movement (the action) takes the minimum possible value.
According to Max Plank, this principle is more general than the
"principle of conservation of energy" although the latter is much better known.
Plank goes on by saying that "conservation of energy" comes from Hamiltons
principle but not the other way around.
In Newtonian physics, action is contrary to reaction.
"Action" is the force exerted by a body to another one, which in turn exerts to
the former a force of equal intensity and of contrary sense which is called
"reaction".
In Hamiltons principle, as well as Planks formulation, the
action is naturally, a force multiplied by time. If distances are invariant and unitary,
as occurs in the fields of associated angular factors, Hamiltons principle performs
when:
1.-
A system passes from a position, with determined added angular forces, to another
where the addition is lower. Faradays vision.
2.-
A system passes from a position to a future one which presents smaller space field
contraction than at the initial position. Einsteins vision.
Continuing in colloquial jargon, a
system tends to occupy those contiguous positions in the field, where it has more
available space or where space contraction is smaller.
On the contrary, if a system occupies other position with more
contracted or with less available space, it can only be caused by dominant tendencies
which oblige the system to be there. Yet, when these tendencies disappear, the system will
go back to its habitual behaviour ruled by " the law of minimum effort".
It should be pointed out that the connotation "possible contiguous
positions", used before, links with the interval of validity of Hamiltons
principle. The principles formulation is not valid for all the movement course but
only for sufficiently small stretches.
3.2.-
APPLICATION OF FIELDS OF ANGULAR FACTORS.
The importance of the "fields
of associated angular factors" lays, principally, in its practical applications on
phenomena ruled by complex oscillatory pattern, represented by means of a curve in a
variable scale: equity and corporate charts which reflect the time series of the evolution
of a key parameter: monthly cash flow, revenues, margins of products, costs, etc. which
allow to extract consequences easily and swiftly, impossible to be detected, in many
cases, by conventional methods.
It will be announced, within a short period of time the availability of
its practical application to the corporate world, as strategic guide for decision making..
The fields of associated angular factors have demonstrated to be
efficient in subjects very different from those mentioned before. This is the case of
issues in high theoretical physics: spin analysis of the oscillation patterns of loops of
super strings. For the first time, a glimpse of the identification of those oscillation
patterns with their sensorial appearance as particles has been caught.
3.3.- CONSTRUCTION OF A FIELD OF ASSOCIATED ANGULAR FACTORS.
The construction of a "field of associated angular factors"
sets off a more profound and general concept than the Cartesian coordinates, because it
pretends the geometry of its spaces freely detaches from its own mathematics, without
previous restrictive configurations, as it occurs if it sets off from Cartesian axis.
For this:
A / Instead of considering as
unitary elements of a length, the aligned elementary lengths 1 and -1, it considers as
unitary element the equivalent expression:
i 2G / Pi or, what is the same, i 2G / 90
Being:
- i: base of the imaginary
numbers. Square root of 1.
- G: degrees of turn, from any start of
rotation.
- Pi: 3,1415....
Of the two expressions before, the
first uses the radian notation in the exponent to express the turning degrees, and the
second uses the sexagesimal expression.
In this work well use the second, the sexagesimal, as it is
didactic wise and to a majority of people, more intuitive than the radians.
Despite all this, the expression in
radians is more mathematic, that is formally deducted from the mathematics without
assuming that 360º are equivalent to 2 Pi radians and therefore it is much easier to
deduct from it deep concepts such as that the fractal fact is included in the expression
of the turning of vectors. Indeed:
i 2 G / Pi
= i G (2 / Pi ) = i 0,636
G
Where we notice that the fractal probability, 2 /
Pi = 0,636 we see in point 1.1.5 shows up again in the general expression of the turns of
unitary vectors, which indicates that the mathematic expectancy of the elongations in the
graphs, or most likely length, which is "the scale pattern multiplied by 0,636"
has its concomitant seed in the turns of the Unitary Forces which "construct"
the shape (form) of these graphs. Despite this and for better understanding of this study,
t6he degrees well use in the equations will be, as aforesaid, the sexagesimal or
what is the same:
i G / 90
The implicit geometry in the unitary
element expression "i power turning
degrees divided by ninety", is of the angular browse from any initial position, to
the opposite position, or what is the same, the implicit geometry is "a bundle of
oriented axis" which opens as a fan, with its origin in the point where the aligned
elementary lengths 1 and 1 of the Cartesian conception change sign, that is, the
zero point.
If the underlying space where the turn takes place is "plane"
(Euclidian space), the contrary position will be at 180º of the first. If its is
"closed" ( Riemanns space) it will be at more than180º, and if it is
"open" ( Lobachevskys space) it will be at less than 180º. All this
without any axis of reference, as the only reference is the position where the turn began
in any of those spaces, whatever the initial position may be.
In this survey only the Euclidian spaces
are considered as underlying, but the generalization of conclusions to the other types of
space is immediate, only by considering the following transformation:
i G/90 = i G/(T/2)
Being:
- T = 180 for Euclidean plane spaces.
- T > 180 for Riemanns closed spaces.
- T < 180 for Lobachevskys open spaces.
This would be the general expression of the UNIDIMENSIONAL
ANGULAR SPACE, being T/2 , or 90º in Euclidean plane spaces, the angular
openness of the bundle of oriented axis from which the negative stretches begins.
Moreover, the separation between both stretches in the real plane delimited by 1, starting
position and 1 final position after the T/2º turn, is precisely the zero point of
separation between both.
B / To find the expression of a BIDIMENSIONAL
ANGULAR SPACE, instead of considering as unitary elements 1 and 1 for each
dimension in the associated angular factors, we multiply the expression of the
"angular" equivalent by itself, as we would do in geometry to obtain an area
from a length:
i G / 90 x i G
/ 90 = i G / 45
This tells us that the geometry of
the implicit plane in the expression : "i power turning degrees, divided by 45"
is a square divided in two parts by a dividing diagonal. Remember that if in the
unidimensional expression 90 appeared, it was because the 0 point of separation was at
90º of the imaginary turn of the real axis 1 and 1.
Here, in the bidimensional expression, the appearance of 45 indicates that at 45º of the
enclosing real axis the zero line of separation of two planes, positive and negative, will
be found. In this case, the figure being a square they will be two surfaces in a triangle
shape.
|